Black and White Glass Architecture wallpaper
Just in terms of pure numbers, the still disappointing statistics, has anyone else noticed that Republicans have suddenly started to love the job statistics put out by the Department of Labor. Its not that conservatives completely hate statistics, they just tend to only site ones made by economic cranks like Art Laffner. I’d call Laffner and his conservative sycophants clowns, but that would be giving them too much credit. When the country or individual states can afford them I love tax cuts, who doesn’t. Though one of the biggest differences in liberals who like tax cuts and conservative who worship tax cuts, as though they were some super-natural force, is the ability to see the real costs. What good does a few dollars in tax cuts do if they’re paid for with education cuts, or cuts to meat inspections, cuts to bridge repair, cuts to college loans, cuts to energy research and innovation. Liberals look at that and connections to the general quality of life and think maybe these tax cuts – the Bush tax cuts that are now kind of the Democratic Party tax cuts – are not producing a net increase in positive outcomes that make the country a better place to live now and for the next generation. Like a lot of what conservatives believe (breast milk cures gayness, government subsidies are only good when Republicans are the recipients) there is a rigidity of beliefs much like that of Iranisn fundamentalists. Those who bother to debate them in forums are keenly aware of the mentality. You would think you were trying to convert someone from one religion to another. You have offended the dogma of their church of the divine tax cut. A large part of the offered justification for tax cuts for those who enjoy large income is that tax cuts create jobs and prosperity. Well, they have certainly made Mitt Romney very wealthy. The other 90% of American so so much: Exposing the “Job Creator” Fraud
With cunning and contempt and catechismal fervor the super-rich have argued that all money should move to the top, where it will be used to stimulate the economy and create jobs. But they ignore the facts that prove them wrong. And it doesn’t take much to prove them wrong.
1. First, a look at the success of the super-rich: Money has quickly moved to the top
Based on IRS figures, the richest 1% nearly tripled its share of America’s after-tax income from 1980 to 2006. That’s an extra trillion dollars a year. Then, in the first year after the 2008 recession, they took 93% of all the new income.
Wealth is even more skewed. The richest 10% own 83% of financial wealth, which they’ve skillfully arranged to be taxed at just 15%, ostensibly because they pump that money back into job-creating ventures. More on that misconception later.
Conservatives claim that wealth inequality has remained steady for the richest Americans. But data from Edward Wolff shows that the excess wealth was simply redistributed among the rest of the top 5%, who saw their share of America’s net worth increase by 18 percent from 1983 to 2007. It was also noted by Sam Pizzigati that much of the top-level wealth was socked away tax-free overseas, a fact largely confirmed by a Tax Justice Network study.
2. Corporations are just as successful: profits have doubled, taxes cut in half
While corporate profits have doubled to $1.9 trillion in less than ten years, the corporate income tax rate, which for thirty years hovered around the 20-25% level, suddenly dropped to 10% after the recession. The biggest firms basically said “We’re not paying.”
That’s a half-trillion dollars a year unpaid by the very companies who have successfully convinced much of America that their tax rates are too high.
The tax they actually pay is very low relative to other countries. U.S. corporations paid a smaller rate of income taxes than all but two of the OECD countries analyzed by the Office of Management and Budget and the Census Bureau. A Treasury report agreed, noting that the Tax/GDP rate for U.S. companies was 35% lower than the OECD average from 2000 to 2005.
Corporations even pay less than low-wage American workers. On their 2011 profits of $1.97 trillion, corporations paid $181 billion in federal income taxes (9%) and $40 billion in state income taxes (2%), for a total income tax burden of 11%. The poorest 20% of American citizens pay 17.4% in federal, state, and local taxes.
3. Some Non-Job-Creation Facts
The Wall Street Journal noted in 2009 that the Bush tax cuts led to the “worst track record for jobs in recorded history.” 25 million people remain unemployed or underemployed, with 30 to 50 percent of recent college graduates in one of those categories. Among unemployed workers, nearly 43 percent have been without a job for six months or longer.
For the jobs that remain, most are low-paying, with the only real employment growth occurring in retail sales and food preparation. A recent report by the National Employment Law Project confirms that lower-wage occupations (up to about $14 per hour) accounted for 21 percent of recession losses and 58 percent of recovery growth, while mid-wage occupations (between $14 and $21 per hour) accounted for 60 percent of recession losses and only 22 percent of recovery growth.
The minimum wage is shamefully low, about 30% lower than the inflation-adjusted 1968 figure. And the tiny pay can’t be blamed on small business. Two-thirds of America’s low-wage workers, according to another National Employment Law Project report, work for companies that have at least 100 employees.
All these job woes persist while productivity has continued to grow, with an 80% increase since 1973 as median worker pay has stagnated.
4. So what are the “job creators” doing with all their money?
Over 90% of the assets owned by millionaires are held in a combination of low-risk investments (bonds and cash), the stock market, and real estate. Business startup costs made up less than 1% of the investments of high net worth individuals in North America in 2011. (Note: Fox News is constantly echoing this myth that we have to give massive tax breaks to the wealthy or they will not start new businesses. The wealthy invest very little in entrepreneurial stray-ups. Romney is on record and saying that Bain switched its leverage focus to taking over established businesses because start-ups were too risky)
Perhaps, instead, they’re building businesses on their own? No. Only 3 percent of the CEOs, upper management, and financial professionals were entrepreneurs in 2005, even though they made up about 60 percent of the richest .1% of Americans. A recent study found that less than 1 percent of all entrepreneurs came from very rich or very poor backgrounds. They come from the middle class.
That deserves repeating. Entrepreneurs come from the middle class.
Not surprisingly, then, since the middle class has been depleted by the steady accumulation of wealth at the top, the number of entrepreneurs per capita has decreased 53% since 1977, and the number of self-employed Americans has decreased 20% since 1991.
5. Big business is even worse at job creation
First of all, the cash holdings for non-financial U.S. firms increased to $1.24 trillion in 2011, with about 57 percent of it stashed overseas. Commerce Department figures show that U.S. companies cut their work forces by 2.9 million from 2000 to 2009 while increasing overseas employment by 2.4 million.
The top holders of cash, including Apple and Google and Intel and Coca Cola and Chevron, are also spending their money on stock buybacks (which increase stock option prices), dividends to investors, and subsidiary acquisitions. According to Bloomberg, share repurchasing is at one of its highest levels in 25 years.
6. The Big Fraud: Tax us less, and the jobs will come
Despite their unwillingness to invest in jobs, and even in the face of damning evidence against their tax myths, the super-rich fight like wildcats at any suggestion that they support the country that provided their wealth. Way back in 1984, right after the Reagan tax cuts, the U.S. Treasury Department came to the obvious but belated conclusion that tax cuts cause a loss of revenue. A 2006 Treasury Department study found that extending the Bush tax cuts would have no beneficial effect on the U.S. economy. Other sources have confirmed that economic growth was fastest in years with relatively high top marginal tax rates.
Ample evidence exists to show that no relationship exists between the capital gains tax rate and investment. As noted in the Washington Post, “The top tax rate on investment income has bounced up and down over the past 80 years – from as high as 39.9 percent in 1977 to just 15 percent today – yet investment just appears to grow with the cycle, seemingly unaffected.” In fact, the low rate may even have a negative effect on growth. A Congressional Research Service report states: “Capital gains tax rate increases appear to increase public saving and may have little or no effect on private saving. Consequently, capital gains tax increases likely have a positive overall impact on national saving and investment.”
7. So what becomes of the jobs?
Corporations are hoarding over a trillion dollars. The richest 1% take a trillion dollars a year more than productivity-based earnings since 1980. Over eight trillion untaxed dollars is being hidden overseas.
That’s a present value of ten trillion misdirected dollars. Just 1/10 of that would create 25 million jobs, one for every unemployed or underemployed worker in America. Or a $45,000 a year job for every college student in the United States.
But the people who call themselves “job creators” do nothing to make that happen.
( via Paul Buchheit, the editor and main author of “American Wars: Illusions and Realities” (Clarity Press)
So what I have posted here is heresy. It is in violation of the holy edicts of conservatism to point out that trickle on America economics does not work for most Americans. The value American workers they create in products and services (GDP) is largely redistributed to the top of the pyramid. It used to be, for the most part, if you worked hard, the American worker got ahead. Now work is rewarded by the plutocrats at the top by letting workers keep their heads barely above water and conservatives like Romney and Ryan think you can not being grateful for their generosity. Where capitalism after FDR”s New Deal was about a partnership between labor and management, now its a war and workers are losing that war. But conservatives are appealing to those workers claiming that it’s all Obama’s fault for not cutting taxes. Billionaires. Billionaires, hedge fund brats and assorted elites mind you, are complaining that Democrats are turning the U.S. into a Marxist paradise. Which is like a 600 pound donut shop customer complaining he doesn’t get to eat enough donuts. Oh, the injustice.
Besides having the moral sensibilities of a weasel in heat, the Romney campaign is lying for a few reasons. A Republican explains one of the reasons, Why Paul Ryan thought he could get away with lying: 6 theories
2. And the benefits of lying outweigh the risks
“Romney and Ryan are obviously engaging in some simple cost-benefit analysis,” says Paul Waldman at The American Prospect. And right now, the costs of “getting a ‘Pants on Fire’ rating from Politifact” aren’t nearly as great as the rewards from certain “specific falsehoods they’re telling about Obama.” After George H.W. Bush tarred Walter Mondale’s campaign with a damaging but made-up quote in a 1984 debate, Bush’s press secretary was blunt: “You can say anything you want during a debate, and 80 million people hear it”; when newspapers point out the lies, “So what?” he said. “Maybe 200 people read it, or 2,000, or 20,000.” Indeed, “the Romney campaign is clearly counting on” the idea that “most casual voters don’t read editorials and fact-checker columns,” says Steve Kornacki at Salon. That’s a pretty safe assumption.
The average Republican voter does not want facts, they want their fun-house mirror idea of the world reinforced by their leaders.
Cenk Uygur Unravels Anti-Obama Weirdo Dinesh D’Souza and His Movie, Conspiracy 2016: Obama’s America
D’Souza later tried to revise history by claiming Bush never turned in a deficit of over $1 trillion. “The largest Bush deficit was $500 billion dollars,” he claimed. “The lowest Obama deficit is $1 trillion. Untrue? ”
“Untrue,” Cenk responded. “When Obama got into office, Bush left him a $1.2 trillion dollar deficit in his last year.”
“His last year?” D’Souza said. “You mean 2009?”
“2008,” Cenk responded.
“In 2008, America’s deficit was under $500 billion dollars. It was Obama who carried that on to an over $1 trillion deficit in ’09,” Claimed D’Souza.
D’Souza is on wing-nut welfare at a couple of conservative “think” tanks so of course he has memorized the number writ on stone tablets and handed down to all true believers. The facts however are that Bush and Republicans left a $1.3 trillion deficit ( what an $800 billion error between friends) and projected deficits based on Bush spending levels, of $8 trillion for the ten years after Bush left office. here is the conservative mind ta work: the economy was and is just one big toy. Not just now, but anytime they break the toy – which happens regularly – voters get pissed off and vote in a Democrat. Conservative rewrite history to make Democrats responsible – because conservatives are for small gov’mint, don’t ya know. They than run for office based on the slow pace Democrats are taking to repair the toy Republicans broke. Every time the toy breaks is just another opportunity for Conservatives to take the little toys average Americans worked so hard to get, because look at the economy, we can’t afford to have nice things like Medicare and education.
Former Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland: “Mitt Romney Has So Little Economic Patriotism That Even His Money Needs A Passport”
Former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland launched into a brutal assault on Mitt Romney Tuesday night on the opening night of the Democratic Convention, branding him as rich and out of touch.
“If Mitt was Santa Claus, he’d fire the reindeer and outsource the elves,” he shouted, as he shouted his entire speech.
“Mitt Romney has so little economic patriotism that even his money needs a passport,” he added, in a series of one-liners designed to fire up the Democratic base. “It summers on the beaches of the Cayman Islands, and winters on the slopes of the Swiss Alps.”
This is worth a read as well, Julián Castro’s Rebuttal to the GOP
and Fox’s Dishonest Handling Of Whether Americans Are “Better Off” Than They Were